There is another AI agent announcement every week. Google is building them, vendors are selling them, and LinkedIn would have you believe every marketing team will soon have an autonomous employee running campaigns around the clock.
It is easy to conclude the next competitive advantage is building an AI agent as fast as possible. Robert Simpkins, co-founder of Propel, argues from a year of building agentic systems for Google Ads that this is the wrong frame. The businesses that see genuine commercial value follow roughly the same journey — and the ones that struggle usually skip straight to the expensive part.
1. Build the foundation before AI is involved
Before experimenting with AI, invest in two things: your knowledge base and your data. This is the least exciting stage, which is probably why it is the one most often skipped.
One of the biggest misconceptions about AI is that it compensates for poor processes. In reality it automates those processes faster.
The quality of any AI system depends far less on the model you choose than on the context you give it. Even the most capable LLM cannot make sensible decisions when business knowledge is inaccessible and data is fragmented across platforms.
What the knowledge base should document
In a format AI can consume:
- Products
- Services
- Business rules
- Tone of voice
- Campaign structure
- Internal processes
In parallel, make marketing data accurate, connected and accessible. Whether you use BigQuery or another centralized warehouse matters less than eliminating the silos that stop AI from seeing the full picture.
2. Exhaust off-the-shelf AI before you build
You do not need developers to start benefiting from AI. Simpkins is blunt about it: most Google Ads teams have not yet exhausted what today's off-the-shelf tools already do.
What is already possible
Start by exporting campaign data into ChatGPT or Claude. Ask it to audit account structure, identify wasted spend, surface search term opportunities, or review your shopping feed. Current models are remarkably capable at analyzing large datasets and routinely uncover patterns that used to take hours in spreadsheets.
Next, connect those tools to Google Ads, Google Analytics or Google Merchant Center through pre-built Model Context Protocol (MCP) connectors. Instead of exporting spreadsheets weekly, you query live account data while retaining persistent business context through projects or custom GPTs.
For many organizations this combination delivers the majority of the value they will ever need. Build only when you have genuinely reached the limits of this setup.
3. Build custom systems when complexity demands it
Eventually you may outgrow off-the-shelf tools — when requirements get specific.
You might need to combine advertising performance with stock availability, pricing, margin and CRM data. Or have AI continuously monitor accounts rather than waiting for prompts. Or automate approval workflows while retaining appropriate controls.
That is when custom development becomes worthwhile. Developers make AI systems more reliable: custom MCPs, guardrails, orchestration, scheduling and cost optimization together turn an interesting demo into a system dependable enough to use every day.
4. Identify and back your early adopters
Ironically, the biggest obstacle to AI adoption rarely has anything to do with technology. It is people.
Organizations that progress fastest do not expect every employee to become an AI expert overnight. They identify enthusiastic early adopters and give them space to experiment, then have those people share what works so the workflows gradually embed across the wider team.
Rather than replacing marketers, AI changes how and where marketers create value. The last decade already handed execution to algorithms through Smart Bidding, broad match and Performance Max. Agentic AI is the next stage of that evolution, and the marketer's role keeps shifting from manual execution toward strategy and judgment.
The goal is not autonomous marketing
The biggest mistake Simpkins sees is businesses trying to automate every aspect of Google Ads. That is not where the value is.
Agentic AI is exceptionally good at repetitive, data-heavy work: auditing accounts, monitoring performance, analyzing trends, surfacing optimization opportunities. Take those off experienced marketers' lists and they spend more time on strategy, creative problem-solving and business objectives.
The teams that outperform over the next few years will not necessarily have the most sophisticated agentic AI. They will be the ones who understand where AI creates leverage, where human judgment still matters, and how to build the foundations that let the two work together.
The practical read
The gap worth sitting with is the one between stage one and stage two.
Most advertising operations run across fragmented platforms with different reporting structures, stitched together by a person and a spreadsheet. Attach an agent to that and, in Simpkins' framing, you have simply automated a broken process faster.
The advice is also well timed. Google has stacked the AI Max migration and the removal of Search language targeting into the same month, and each one strips out another manual control. As that continues, the leverage available to operators moves away from platform settings and toward the context and data you feed those platforms. See Google Ads Is Removing Language Targeting From Search Campaigns for the same pattern.
For the same logic applied to search visibility, Most AI Visibility Gains Are Just Technical Debt Repayment makes the parallel case: finishing the deferred homework is usually cheaper and faster than buying a new tactic.